Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Ramirez-Quezada v. Garland
as 23-2228
Petitioner:
JORGE RAMIREZ-QUEZADA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Miguel Arturo Garcia et al
as 2:2020cv08727
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Jorge Ramirez Jimenez individually and doing business as Sports Harbour, Raymond Rahim Javan individually and doing business as Sports Harbour and Miguel Arturo Garcia individually and doing business as Sports Harbour
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521
Jorge Ramirez v. Speedy Cash
as 2:2019cv00058
Plaintiff:
Jorge Ramirez
Defendant:
Speedy Cash
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Jorge Armando Julio v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-71645
Petitioner:
JORGE ARMANDO JULIO, AKA Jorge Julio Armando, AKA Jorge Ramirez Sanchez
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Jorge Ramirez v. City Fibers, Inc.
as 2:2017cv01300
Defendant:
City Fibers, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jorge Ramirez
Jorge Ramirez-Ramirez v. Jeff B. Sessions
as 17-70108
Petitioner:
JORGE RAMIREZ-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
SALLY Q. YATES, Acting Attorney General and JEFF B. SESSIONS, Attorney General
J & J Sports Productions Incorporated v. Ramirez et al
as 2:2015cv01007
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions Incorporated
Defendant:
Jorge Ramirez, Alicia Ramirez and La Hacienda Zacatecas LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
USA v. Jorge Sanchez
as 14-50462
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JORGE RAMIREZ SANCHEZ
Jorge Galdamez v. Rush Truck Centers of Californ
as 14-80067
Plaintiff - Respondent:
JORGE RAMIREZ GALDAMEZ, on behalf of himself and others similarly Situated
Defendant - Petitioner:
RUSH TRUCK CENTERS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
Jorge Galdamez v. Rush Truck Centers of Californ
as 14-80067
Respondent:
JORGE RAMIREZ GALDAMEZ, on behalf of himself and others similarly Situated
Petitioner:
RUSH TRUCK CENTERS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
