Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CACERES v. XYLOCOPA, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv13548
Plaintiff:
JOSE CACERES
Defendant:
XYLOCOPA, LLC and LUIS GUTIERREZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
CACERES v. XYLOCOPA, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv13548
Plaintiff:
JOSE CACERES
Defendant:
XYLOCOPA, LLC and LUIS GUTIERREZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Caceres v. 5-Minute Express Car Wash Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv03563
Plaintiff:
Jose Caceres
Defendant:
5-Minute Express Car Wash Corp. and Gurminder Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jose Caceres-Abreu v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
as 19-12829
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE CACERES-ABREU
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Caceres-Abreu v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2016cv00173
Petitioner:
Jose Caceres-Abreu
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General for the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Caceres-Abreu v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2016cv00134
Petitioner:
Jose Caceres-Abreu
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Caceres-Abreu v. State of Florida Ninth Judicial Circuit Court et al
as 8:2015cv02854
Plaintiff:
Jose Caceres-Abreu
Defendant:
State of Florida Ninth Judicial Circuit Court, Department of Corrections, State of Florida and Polk County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caceres v. Peprico Inc.
as 1:2014cv03937
Plaintiff:
Jose Caceres
Defendant:
Peprico Inc., Giosto Priola, Salvatore Corea and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Eduardo Lara et al v. Pizza Hut Inc et al
as 2:2005cv07150
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Lara, Beth Abanathie, Stanley Abraham and others
Defendant:
Pizza Hut Inc and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
