Cases 1 - 10 of 12
USA v. Jose Nava-Gutierrez
as 19-11268
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE NAVA-GUTIERREZ, also known as Jose Angel Nava-Gutierrez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Jose Nava-Martinez
as 16-10408
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE NAVA-MARTINEZ
Allgood v. Curtis et al
as 4:2015cv02721
Plaintiff:
Christopher Allgood
Defendant:
Stephanie Curtis, Jose Nava and Joyce Batson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allgood v. Curtis et al
as 4:2015cv02709
Petitioner:
Christopher Allgood
Respondent:
Stephanie Curtis, Jose Nava and Joyce Batson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nava v. Compass Bank et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER 13cv1309
as 4:2013cv01636
Plaintiff:
Jose Nava
Defendant:
Compass Bank and The Davis Group Attorneys & Counselors, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Nava v. Compass Bank
as 4:2013cv01309
Plaintiff:
Jose Nava
Defendant:
Compass Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471 Declaratory & Injunctive Relief - Foreclo
McNickles v. Isbell et al
as 4:2012cv02534
Plaintiff:
Carlos McNickles
Defendant:
Wanda Isbell, Betty Williams, Robert Dalecki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Juan Nava-Medina
as 11-50780
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN JOSE NAVA-MEDINA, also known as Henry Rivera
Jose Nava-Duran v. USA, et al
as 11-50742
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE NAVA-DURAN
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN, REEVES COUNTY DETENTION CENTER III, BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
USA v. Luis Navarrete-Bermudez
as 11-50380
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LUIS NAVARRETE-BERMUDEZ, also known as Luis Robles-Rivas, also known as Jose Nava-Bermudez, also known as Gregorio Gonzalez, also known as Jose Luis Beruman, also known as Jose Bermudez-Nava, also known as Gregorio Rodriguez-Gonzalez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
