Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Rosario v. New Beginning 1883 Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv05835
Defendant:
Ramon Duran, New Beginning 1883 Corp., Jose Almonte and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Rosario
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rosario v. EZ Rubbish Removal NY Inc.
as 1:2019cv04986
Plaintiff:
Jose Rosario
Defendant:
EZ Rubbish Removal NY Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Grullard et al v. City of New York, et al
as 1:2015cv06612
Plaintiff:
Keith Grullard and Jose Rosario
Defendant:
City of New York, Sergeant Mahburbur Khan, Police Officers "John Doe" 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Silverio v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv02467
Plaintiff:
Ariel Silverio
Defendant:
The City of New York , Oscar Diaz, Jose Rosario and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv06755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv04787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Rosario v. Denalver
as 1:2013cv00999
Petitioner:
Jose Rosario
Respondent:
Noel Denalver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rosario v. N.Y.C. Dept. of Correction et al
as 1:2012cv04795
Plaintiff:
Jose Rosario
Defendant:
N.Y.C. Dept. of Correction and Carlton Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosario v. International Auto Mall & Leasing Center, Inc.
as 1:2012cv04059
Plaintiff:
Jose Rosario
Defendant:
International Auto Mall & Leasing Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Morris et al v. Lettire Construction, Corp et al
as 1:2012cv00043
Plaintiff:
Alfred Morris, Terrell Gardner, Andre Henry and others
Defendant:
Lettire Construction, Corp, Lettire Builders, Inc., Lettire 124th Street, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
