Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Smith v. Young et al
as 2:2021cv00299
Plaintiff:
Jackson D Smith and Jackson D. Smith
Not Classified By Court:
Joseph O Young, Jr
Defendant:
Joseph O. Young, Jr., Pure Insurance and Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young, et al v. Ledet, et al
as 2:2020cv02165
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cornelius Young, III, John Fitzgerald Bonvillain, Jr., Chad Knox and others
Defendant:
Mitch Dupre, Stephen Bergeron, Rhonda Ledet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Russo et al
as 6:2014cv00901
Plaintiff:
Joseph C Young, III
Defendant:
Ryan Russo, Mark Hebert and Sheriffs Dept St Mary Parish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. Young
as 2:2013cv00358
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Hale
Defendant:
Joseph P Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Willingham v. Young
as 2:2013cv00009
Plaintiff:
Reco Rontaza Willingham
Defendant:
Joseph P Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Willingham v. Young
as 2:2013cv00010
Plaintiff:
Reco Rontaza Willingham
Defendant:
Joseph P Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ledezma v. Young
as 2:2012cv02935
Plaintiff:
Felix Ignacio Lambert Ledezma
Defendant:
Joseph P Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Clinton v. Young
as 2:2012cv02249
Plaintiff:
David Clinton
Defendant:
Joseph P Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Young et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as 6:2012cv01623
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd
Plaintiff:
Joseph William Young and Cheryl Ann Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stout v. Young et al
as 2:2011cv02038
Plaintiff:
Everett Leon Stout
Defendant:
Joseph Peter Young, Jr and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
