Cases 1 - 7 of 7
In Re: Reginald McFadden
as 21-2
Respondent:
Thomas Bellein, C-COC-NYS, Carl J. Koenigsmann, Deputy Commissioner; Chief Medical Officer of DOCCS, William Canfield, Medical Director; Southport Correctional Facility and others
Petitioner:
Reginald McFadden, AKA Reginald Ghaffar McFadden
Acosta v. Thomas
as 19-2728
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. Vadlamudi, Facility Health Director, Marcy Correctional Facility, Joseph Gullo, NYS DOCCS Audiologist, Carl J. Koenigsmann, Deputy Commissioner, Chief Medical Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jose Acosta
Defendant:
John Serhan, NYS DOCCS Audiologist
McFadden v. Annucci
as 19-585
Defendant:
Carl J. Koenigsmann, Deputy Commissioner; Chief Medical Officer of DOCCS, J. Cross, Mailroom Supervisor; ACF, Thomas Bellein, C-COC-NYS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
R. Roemesser, Inmate Assistant, Attica Correctional Facility, Joseph Noeth, First Deputy Superintendent at ACF and Eric Schuessler, Corrections Officer; ACF
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reginald McFadden, AKA Reginald Ghaffar McFadden
McFadden v. Annucci
as 18-1807
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Reginald McFadden, AKA Reginald Ghaffar McFadden
Defendant - Appellee:
Anthony J. Annucci, Jr. Acting Commissioner; DOCCS, Maureen Boll, Deputy Commissioner and Counsel; DOCCS, Jeff McKoy, Deputy Commissioner of Programs; DOCCS and others
Acosta v. Thomas et al
as 9:2016cv00890
Plaintiff:
Jose Acosta
Defendant:
Justin Thomas, Dr. Vadlamudi, Carl J. Koenigsmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFadden v. Annucci et al
as 6:2016cv06105
Plaintiff:
Reginald McFadden
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Jr., Maureen Boll, Jeff McKoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gullo v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 6:2008cv01565
Plaintiff:
Joseph Gullo
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
