Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Medina v. United States Department of Treasury, et al
as 24-8000
Plaintiff:
VANESSA MEDINA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America and others
Tay v. City of Tulsa et al
as 2:2023cv00932
Plaintiff:
Paul Tay
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, George Theron Bynum, Wendell Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 0640 Indian Tribal Rights
Medina v. United States Department of Treasury et al
as 2:2023cv00241
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, United States of America President, United States Department of Treasury and others
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Magistrelli v. Former US Attorney et al
as 2:2022cv00250
Defendant:
Former US Attorney, Former United States of America President, Illinois Circuit Court Judge and others
Plaintiff:
Karol Dawn Magistrelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Griner v. Biden et al
as 2:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Devan Griner
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., USA, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
American Federation of Government Employees Local 2586 et al v. Biden et al
as 5:2021cv01130
Plaintiff:
American Federation of Government Employees Local 2586, Brian King, Sandy Lawson and others
Defendant:
Joseph R Biden, Jr, Lloyd J Austin, III, Office of Personnel Management and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Komor v. USA et al
as 1:2021cv01935
Plaintiff:
Christian Robert Komor
Defendant:
USA and Joseph R. Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Komor v. USA et al
as 1:2021cv01560
Defendant:
Sonia Aggarwal, Brenda Mallory, John Kerry and others
Plaintiff:
Christian Robert Komor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
