Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Simpson v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2018cv04133
Defendant:
Denise Bardwell, Unknown CBM Food Services Employees, Alejandro Reyes and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Roy Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kling v. Louie et al
as 4:2018cv04027
Plaintiff:
Kary Gene Kling
Defendant:
Ed Louie, Robert Dooley, Jeremy Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maday v. Dooley et al
as 4:2017cv04168
Plaintiff:
Stanley J. Maday
Defendant:
Bob Dooley, Dennis Kaemingk, Mary Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry L. Thompson v. Josh Klimek, et al
as 17-3225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Terry L. Thompson
Defendant - Appellee:
Josh Klimek, Unit Manager, Diane Romkema, Case Manager, Jerrame Larsen, D-H-O Hearing Officer and others
Kader v. Deparatment of Corrections et al
as 4:2017cv04106
Plaintiff:
Brian E. Kader
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Susan Johannsen, Robert Dooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brakeall v. Stanwick-Klemik et al
as 4:2017cv04101
Plaintiff:
Winston Grey Brakeall
Defendant:
Jenifer Stanwick-Klemik, Josh Klimek, Dennis Kaemingk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Linson v. Klimek et al
as 4:2016cv04167
Plaintiff:
Todd D. Linson
Defendant:
Josh Klimek and Tammy DeJong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Kinter v. Robert Dooley, et al
as 16-3333
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Thomas Kinter
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert Dooley, Director of Prison Operations, Darren Young, Warden, SDSP, Troy Ponto, Associate Warden, Jameson Annex and others
Thompson v. Dooley et al
as 4:2016cv04071
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Thompson
Defendant:
Robert Dooley, Darren Young, Troy Ponto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis Lufkin v. Robert Dooley, et al
as 16-2126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dennis Lufkin
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert Dooley, Director of Prisons, Jennifer Stanwick, Warden, in her individual capacity, Josh Klimek, Unit Manager, in his individual capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
