Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Isaac v. Marsh et al
as 1:2020cv01993
Defendant:
Z.N. Hammers, Major Curtis Grice, Josh Shapiro and others
Plaintiff:
Derek Isaac
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laurensau v. Estock et al
as 1:2020cv01978
Petitioner:
Joseph Laurensau
Respondent:
Lee J. Estock, Pennsylvania Attorney General Office and Josh Shapiro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smalley v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2020cv01955
Respondent:
John Wetzel, . Kevin Ransom, Josh Shapiro and others
Petitioner:
Justin Lee Smalley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WISE v. MASON et al
as 3:2020cv01617
Respondent:
Schuylkill County, Michael O'Pake, Josh Shapiro and others
Petitioner:
Anthony L. Wise
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jenkins v. Marsh et al
as 1:2020cv01293
Respondent:
Judge Charles Erhlich, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, Lawrence Krasner and others
Petitioner:
Dorel Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dupree v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2020cv00878
Respondent:
John E. Wetzel, Lawrence S. Krasner and Josh Shapiro
Petitioner:
Nicholas Dupree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Haight v. Harry et al
as 3:2020cv00788
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, Jeanna Longo, Kenneth Osokow and others
Petitioner:
William Haight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Helfrich et al
as 3:2020cv00399
Defendant:
Officer Troy Cromer, York County Police Department, Alisa Litavidis and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Ransome et al
as 3:2020cv00234
Respondent:
Superintendent Ransome, Josh Shapiro, Larry Krasner and others
Petitioner:
Terrance Pitts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tarver v. Pennsylvania Attorney General Office et al
as 1:2020cv00199
Petitioner:
Foster Lee Tarver
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General Office, Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas and Josh Shapiro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
