Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Marcus Satterfield v. Hollie Mccaddams
as 24-6196
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD
Defendant:
HOLLIE MCCADDAMS, ADA IN SUPERIOR COURTS ROXBORO NC PERSON COUNTY SUED IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY, MERILYN P. NEWELL, MAYOR OF ROXBORO CITY OF ROXBORO SUED IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY, JOSH STEIN, ATTORNEY GENERALS COMMISSIONER SUED IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY and others
Timothy Hankins, Sr. v. State of North Carolina, et al
as 21-5156
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timothy Omar Hankins, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
State of North Carolina, NC Administrative Officers of the Courts, North Carolina Court of Appeals and others
State of Maryland, et al v. EDUC, et al
as 20-5283
Plaintiff / Appellee:
District of Columbia, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of Vermont, Commonwealth of Virginia, ex rel. Mark R. Herring, Attorney General, State of New York and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Elisabeth Devos, in her official capacity as Secretary of Education and United States Department of Education
State of Maryland, et al v. EDUC, et al
as 20-5268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
People of the State of California, ex rel. Xavier Becerra, Attorney General, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State of Rhode Island and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Elisabeth Devos, in her official capacity as Secretary of Education and United States Department of Education
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of New York, State of Vermont, Commonwealth of Virginia, ex rel. Mark R. Herring, Attorney General and others
PETA v. Josh Stein
as 20-1807
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC., FARM SANCTUARY, FARM FORWARD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN GUSKIEWICZ, in his official capacity as Chancellor of the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill and ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH STEIN, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, INC.
PETA v. NC Farm Bureau
as 20-1776
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT, FOOD & WATER WATCH, ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND and others
Defendant:
KEVIN GUSKIEWICZ, in his official capacity as Chancellor of the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill and ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH STEIN, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina
Defendant / Appellee:
CAROL L. FOLT, in her official capacity as Chancellor of the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
PETA v. Josh Stein
as 20-1777
Intervenor Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT, FOOD & WATER WATCH, ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH STEIN, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina and KEVIN GUSKIEWICZ, in his official capacity as Chancellor of the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
Tinika Warren v. Josh Stein
as 19-1615
Defendant / Appellee:
GUILFORD COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT, ANDREW HEIRS, Heirs of Andrew Warren, JOSH STEIN, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TINIKA S. WARREN
Roger Deal, Sr. v. Roy Cooper
as 17-7411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER LEE DEAL, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ROY COOPER, Ex-Attorney General, JOSH STEIN, Attorney General, TRACY NAYER, Assistant A.G. and others
PETA v. Joshua Stein
as 17-1669
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC., ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS and others
Amicus Curiae:
WTVD TELEVISION, LLC, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY, INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CAROL L. FOLT, in her official capacity as Chancellor of the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill and ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH STEIN, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
