Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jones v. City of Las Cruces
as 2:2023cv00901
Plaintiff:
Jovan Jones
Defendant:
City of Las Cruces
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Meany et al v. Atomic Protocol Systems OU et al
as 1:2023cv01582
Plaintiff:
Robert Meany, Graham Dickinson, John Briscoe and others
Defendant:
Atomic Wallet, Konstantin Gladych, Konstantin Gladyshev and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Green-Stewart v. Dolding et al
as 1:2020cv03732
Defendant:
Beverley Dolding, Chris Bilek and Inna Zalessky
Plaintiff:
Jovan Green-Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Busby v. Aleksoski et al
as 5:2017cv00516
Plaintiff:
Sharon K Busby
Defendant:
Jovan Aleksoski , Golaba Aleksoska , ITP Western Express Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vences v. Jackson et al
as 4:2017cv00075
Plaintiff:
Jovane Vences
Defendant:
Officer Jackson, Officer Groves, Officer Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McComb et al v. Malone et al
as 2:2015cv00897
Plaintiff:
Stephen McComb and Jovan Aircraft Services
Defendant:
Scott Malone , CPS Specialized and Peter Emerson
Counter_claimant:
Scott Malone and CPS Specialized
Counter_defendant:
Jovan Aircraft Services and Stephen McComb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McGlothin v. Oates et al
as 1:2013cv00100
Plaintiff:
Jovan G. McGlothin
Defendant:
Dan Oates, Jeffery Longnecker and Barry Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGlothin v. Martin et al
as 1:2013cv00078
Defendant:
W. Barry Martin, Jeffrey Longnecker and City of Aurora
Plaintiff:
Jovan McGlothin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
