Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Albarado v. Lumpkin
as 24-10163
Petitioner:
Juan Manuel Albarado
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Albarado v. Martinez et al
as 1:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
Juan Manuel Albarado
Defendant:
Jerry Martinez, Jennifer Cozby, K Schiwart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albarado v. Collier
as 23-11045
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Juan Manuel Albarado
Defendant / Appellee:
Bryan Collier, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, David Blackwell, Region 5 Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, FNU Merchant, Captain, Robertson Unit and others
Albarado v. Lumpkin
as 23-10778
Petitioner / Appellant:
Juan Manuel Albarado
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Jeneffer Cozby, Warden
Albarado v. Collier et al
as 1:2023cv00152
Plaintiff:
Juan Manuel Albarado
Defendant:
Brian Collier, David Blackwell, FNU Merchant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Juan Albarado
as 23-10602
Petitioner:
In re: Juan Manuel Albarado
Respondent:
Bryan Collier, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Jeneffer Cozby, Warden
Albarado v. Cozby et al
as 3:2023cv01252
Petitioner:
Juan Manuel Albarado
Respondent:
Jennifer Cozby, Bryan Collier and TDCJ - State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Albarado v. State of Texas Land Office
as 3:2023cv01081
Plaintiff:
Juan Manuel Albarado
Defendant:
State of Texas Land Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albarado v. Collier et al
as 1:2023cv00078
Petitioner:
Juan Manuel Albarado
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Jeneffer Cozby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
