Cases 31 - 40 of 2,909
Sivak v. Fletcher, et al.
as 24-2242
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, CIRCUIT JUDGE and MARK J. BENNETT, CIRCUIT JUDGE
In re: Request for International Judicial Assistance from the Eighth District Judge for Civil Matters of Mexico, City Mexico
as 1:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
In re: Request for International Judicial Assistance from the Eighth District Judge for Civil Matters of Mexico, City Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Antar v. Grogins
as 24-910
Plaintiff:
THEODORA F. ANTAR, Individually and as next friend and legal guardian of her minor child A.L. and J.V.
Defendant:
Honorable Judge AUDEN GROGINS, Individually and officially, Honorable Judge SCOTT JONES, Individually and officially, Honorable Judge JANE KUPSON GROSSMAN, individually and officially and others
Raiser v. Gelmis, et al.
as 24-2163
Plaintiff:
AARON RAISER
Defendant:
SUSAN GELMIS, ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
McGore v. US District Court Judges et al
as 2:2024cv10890
Plaintiff:
Darryl McGore
Defendant:
US District Court Judges, Denise Hood, US Supreme Court Justices and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Boersma v. Armstrong
as 24-2090
Plaintiff:
HEATHER LYNN BOERSMA
Defendant:
SEAN ARMSTRONG, Marion County Circuit Court Judge
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02458
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
