Cases 1 - 10 of 27
HEMPHILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02865
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL ANTIONE HEMPHILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BIDEN ADMINISTRATION, JULIAN CASTRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
SHEPHARD v. SMITH et al
as 1:2022cv03375
Plaintiff:
ALONZO D. SHEPHARD
Defendant:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS SMITH, PRICE, BLACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GASTONG v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 1:2022cv01634
Plaintiff:
HARRELL A. GASTONG, IV
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, RONALD N. FICAROTTA, CHIEF JUDGE 13TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BERGERON v. HACKER et al
as 1:2020cv01864
Defendant:
FREEMASONS OF THE UNITED STATES, J. BRITT JOHNSON, UNKNOWN AGENTS OF THE GEORGIA BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Plaintiff:
JACOB ANDREW BERGERON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WRIGHT v. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
as 1:2020cv00186
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTONIO DEVON WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
as 1:2020cv00185
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTONIO DEVON WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
as 1:2020cv00188
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTONIO DEVON WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
as 1:2019cv03866
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTONIO DEVON WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
as 1:2019cv03376
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Plaintiff:
CHARLES A.D. WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
