Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
ZAEBST v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv01732
Plaintiff:
JULIE ANNE ZAEBST and Rajeev Tanwar
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY and PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
REUTZEL v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
JULIE ANN REUTZEL
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MIZRAHI v. TRINITY TRANSITION ASSOCIATES LP et al
as 2:2016cv01387
Plaintiff:
JULI-ANN MIZRAHI
Defendant:
TRINITY TRANSITION ASSOCIATES LP , TRINITY TRANSITION, INC. and DEPAUL HEALTH CARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ROGERS v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv05748
Plaintiff:
JULIE ANN ROGERS
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC , EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Mace v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv01229
Plaintiff:
Julie Ann Mace
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MALIK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2013cv00586
Plaintiff:
JULIE ANN MALIK
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BURKE et al v. CHICKIE'S AND PETE'S, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv00277
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JOHN KOCHER , KEITH ADAMS , JOSEPH HOSEPHROS and others
Defendant:
CHICKIE'S AND PETE'S, INC. , 4010 INC. , PACKER CAFE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
