Cases 1 - 10 of 11
LAPOINT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2020cv06310
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ATIYA K. ROBINSON
Plaintiff:
MARGARET V. LAPOINT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
LYNCH v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2018cv03254
Defendant:
ROSALYN K. ROBINSON and PHILA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 1ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schwartz v. Lumos Networks Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv00415
Plaintiff:
Jacob Schwartz
Defendant:
Lumos Networks Corp., Robert E. Guth, Timothy G. Blitz and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Parshall v. Lumos Networks Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv00369
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Defendant:
Lumos Networks Corp., Lawrence J. Askowitz, Timothy G. Biltz and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
ROBINSON v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv06633
Plaintiff:
OLLIE K. ROBINSON III
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBINSON v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2014cv01526
Petitioner:
JACKIE K. ROBINSON
Respondent:
J. HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROBINSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2013cv04255
Plaintiff:
JACKIE K. ROBINSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ROBINSON v. ZICKEFOOSE
as 1:2011cv00012
Petitioner:
JACKIE K ROBINSON
Respondent:
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROBINSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv52012
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND K. ROBINSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
ROBINSON v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv77276
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND K. ROBINSON
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
