Cases 1 - 10 of 202
REED v. CUSHWA et al
as 1:2023cv03117
Petitioner:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Respondent:
PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, CHRISTOPHER WHITMER and COLLETTE PETERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HILL v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2023cv02270
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL K. HILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON BOUNDARIES and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
OATMAN v. COLLIER et al
as 1:2022cv03678
Plaintiff:
BRIAN G. OATMAN
Defendant:
MANAGEMENT AND TRAINING CORPORATION, A OR K RODRIGUEZ, B. RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SHELDON v. ZOOK
as 1:2022cv01868
Petitioner:
GARY THOMAS SHELDON
Respondent:
K. ZOOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GILLENS v. CARVAJAL et al
as 1:2022cv01645
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GILLENS
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, DOE #1, K. CRADDOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGHES v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv00212
Plaintiff:
JOHN HUGHES, III
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, PATRICIA K. CUSHWA and MICHAEL CARVJAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUNTER v. LARKINS et al
as 1:2021cv03021
Plaintiff:
JASON HUNTER, SR.
Defendant:
JOHN K. LARKINS, III, DARRIN P. GAYLES, HAROLD ALBRITTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAWSON v. BOYLE et al
as 1:2021cv02963
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DAWSON
Defendant:
TERRENCE W. BOYLE and BRYAN K. WELLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HEAD v. SAMPLE et al
as 1:2021cv02550
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HEAD
Defendant:
SAMPLE, J. R. BELL, S. EIRICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
