Cases 1 - 10 of 397
Kirksey v. Cushing et al
as 2:2024cv00560
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lavell Kirksey
Defendant:
Daniel Cushing, K Grabowksi, Officer Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Kennado K Taylor and Kennado Kinte Taylor
Defendant:
John Doe, Gonzalez, Sgt Bogdala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Kennado K Taylor
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe and Kristen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v. Klang et al
as 2:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Fred Lee Davenport
Defendant:
Rodney Klang, Rebecca Tervonen, Sgt Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMath v. Kinnard et al
as 1:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Robert C McMath
Defendant:
Capt Scott C Kinnard, Sgt Julico De Lima Silva and K McBride
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cabagua v. Eplett et al
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Mark Daniel Cabagua
Defendant:
Warden Cheryl Eplett, Kevin Carr, J Ludwig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Eplett
as 2:2023cv01743
Petitioner:
Jeffrey K Walker
Respondent:
Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Buckles, Kyle v. Rich, K. et al
as 3:2023cv00871
Plaintiff:
Kyle W. Buckles
Defendant:
Capt. K. Rich, Sgt. D. Oates and Jackson Co. Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Jackson et al
as 2:2023cv01564
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Defendant:
Officer Jackson, Officer Garvela, John/Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zink v. Labby et al
as 2:2023cv01478
Plaintiff:
Kyle K Zink
Defendant:
Kira Labby, Ms Burnett, Dr Stonefeld and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
