Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Farrell v. Hester
as 4:2024cv04041
Plaintiff:
Kalief K Farrell
Defendant:
Jarred Hester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kuhlman v. Hines et al
as 1:2024cv01065
Plaintiff:
Robert K. Kuhlman
Defendant:
Officer Nicholas Hines, Officer Serena Cunningham and Town of Normal, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. Karlin et al
as 4:2023cv04110
Plaintiff:
Marion Devonne Washington, Sr
Defendant:
Jeremy Karlin, Bryan Anderson, Nathan Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Henry v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv03046
Plaintiff:
Michael Henry
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Election Commission, Kwame Raoul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv03111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Barlow III v. Wolfson et al
as 1:2022cv01152
Plaintiff:
Clinton C Barlow III
Defendant:
Freda Wolfson, Roger Taney, Garret E Brown Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Turner v. Wright
as 3:2022cv03009
Plaintiff:
Derick Lamont Turner
Defendant:
Daniel K Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Anderson v. Yedinak et al
as 1:2021cv01340
Plaintiff:
Juan V Anderson
Defendant:
Randy Yedinak, Michael Regnier, Patrick Delfino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv03213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitten et al v. Rochester Township Republican Central Committee et al
as 3:2021cv03023
Plaintiff:
Darin Whitten, William D. Kaiser, Dorothy Taft and others
Defendant:
Don Gray, Rochester Township Republican Central Committee, Thomas K. Munroe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
