Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Adams v. Bailey et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Adams
Defendant:
Sheriff Bryan Bailey, K-9 Officer Tony Shack, Investigator Christian Dedmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
K. v. Ocean Springs School District et al
as 1:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
D. K.
Defendant:
Ocean Springs School District, David Lee Sprowell, Jr. and John Does 1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pole v. Shearer et al
as 3:2022cv00182
Plaintiff:
Willie Pole
Defendant:
James K. Shearer, John Doe Number One, John Doe Number Two and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker et al v. City of Southaven et al
as 3:2021cv00250
Plaintiff:
Keith Alex Walker and Lenneth Cordell Abram
Defendant:
City of Southaven, Jordan P. Roberts, Hunter M. Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eagan v. Vibrant Church et al
as 1:2021cv00149
Plaintiff:
Laura Ashley Eagan
Defendant:
Vibrant Church, XYZ Corporation, Jason Delgado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kinnel v. Tunica County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2020cv00247
Defendant:
Tunica County, Mississippi, Sheriff K. C. Hamp, Jailer Sharon Hargrow and others
Plaintiff:
Tanyatta Kinnel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Walker et al
as 3:2020cv00385
Plaintiff:
Christopher Blaise Johnson
Defendant:
Heather Luebbers, Benny Dubose, Unknown John and Jane Does A-Z and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matlock v. Bramlett, Jr. et al
as 3:2020cv00381
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, District Attorney John K. Bramlett, Jr. and Max Mayes
Plaintiff:
Sherman Matlock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King v. Bramlett, Jr. et al
as 3:2020cv00378
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, John K. Bramlett, Jr. and Max Mayes
Plaintiff:
Desma King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
