Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Smith v. Diaz, et al.
as 23-3551
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE CHRISTOPHER SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ, XAVIER BECERRA, KEITH L. FAGUNDES and others
(PC) Wells v. Green et al
as 1:2020cv01784
Defendant:
K. Cruz, H. Perez, K. Green and others
Plaintiff:
Nirran Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Smith v. Diaz, et al.
as 1:2020cv00349
Defendant:
D. Clark, M. Lirones, E. Rollins and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Christopher Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Diaz et al
as 4:2020cv01557
Defendant:
D. Clark, M. Lirones, E. Rollins and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Christopher Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Howell v. Diaz et al
as 1:2019cv01612
Defendant:
I. Linon, Garcia, I. Ceballos and others
Plaintiff:
Kareem J. Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Howell v. Cruz, et al.
as 1:2019cv00782
Defendant:
G Magana, A Borona, Raishre and others
Plaintiff:
Kareem J. Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerry A. Burton v. Fred Haws et al
as 2:2008cv05834
Plaintiff:
Jerry A. Burton
Defendant:
J. Cagalawan, R. Clemons, T. L. Cromwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz v. Washington Mutual Bank et al
as 3:2011cv00471
Plaintiff:
John K. Cruz
Defendant:
Washington Mutual Bank and DOES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Andre Jones v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2011cv00296
Plaintiff:
Andre Jones
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility, California State Prison, Los Angeles County/Lancaster (LAC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andre Jones v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2010cv02217
Defendant:
K. Bradford, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California State Prison, Los Angeles County/Lancaster (LAC) and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Jones
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
