Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Lynyrd Skynyrd Productions, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv03050
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Mealove Store, XT01 Store and others
Plaintiff:
Lynyrd Skynyrd Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Booking.com B.V. v. Lee et al
as 1:2016cv00425
Plaintiff:
Booking.com B.V.
Defendant:
Michelle K. Lee and The United States Patent and Trademark Office
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1071
Board of Trustees of The Unive, et al v. Michelle Lee, et al
as 16-11311
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA, THE and PAUL W. BRYANT, JR.
Interested Party - Appellant:
MICHELLE K. LEE, Undersecretary for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Defendant - Appellee:
HOUNDSTOOTH MAFIA ENTERPRISES LLC
Vander Intermediate Holding III Corp. v. Lee
as 1:2016cv00181
Plaintiff:
Vander Intermediate Holding III Corp.
Defendant:
Michelle K. Lee
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1071
RIVER LIGHT V, L.P. et al v. C & L Trading of Miami, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv24605
Plaintiff:
RIVER LIGHT V, L.P. and TORY BURCH LLC
Defendant:
C & L Trading of Miami, Inc. and Sang K. Lee
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Innovation Ventures, LLC et al v. Ultimate One Distributing Corp. et al
as 1:2012cv05354
Defendant:
Gulam Najimi, Wally Najimi, Farid Tursonzadah and others
Plaintiff:
Innovation Ventures, LLC, Living Essential, LLC and International IP Holdings LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
Robert McCormack and Dan-Dee Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Coach Services, Inc. v. Ronet Trading Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv03295
Plaintiff:
Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Ronet Trading Inc. and Kyong K. Lee
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
