Cases 21 - 30 of 36
v. Favello et al
as 1:2011at00451
Defendant:
Lawrence Favello, J A Yates , R H Trimble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Cates et al
as 2:2011cv01744
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Turner
Defendant:
Matthew Cates, P. Medina, Toney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Gomez et al
as 1:2011cv01007
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Clark
Defendant:
R. C. Gomez, S. Mendonca, K. R. Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
K R Tools, Inc. v. Meridian International Co., Ltd. et al
as 2:2011cv01092
Defendant:
Does and Meridian International Co., Ltd.
Counter Defendant:
K R Tools, Inc.
Plaintiff:
K R Tools, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Meridian International Co., Ltd. and Meridian International Co., Ltd., LLC
Weaver v. State of California Department of Coreections et al
as 5:2011cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jeff Weaver
Defendant:
State of California Department of Coreections , San Quentin State Prison and K. R. Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barry Jameson et al v. John Marshall et al
as 2:2011cv00184
Defendant:
Belton, Belton, P D Brazelton and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Jameson
Menefield v. Yates et al
as 1:2010cv02406
Plaintiff:
James Fredrick Menefield
Defendant:
James A. Yates , M C Davis , R Fisher, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irvin v. Yates, et al.
as 1:2010cv01940
Plaintiff:
Kajauna Kenyatta Irvin
Defendant:
James A. Yates , P. D. Brazelton , K R Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Irvin et al
as 1:2010at00816
Defendant:
Kajauna Kenyatta Irvin, James A. Yates , P. D. Brazelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dwayne Rhooms et al. v. Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc., et al.
as 2:2010cv02944
Defendant:
Does, Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America Inc and others
Plaintiff:
K. R., Denese Rhooms and Dwayne Rhooms
In Re:
Toyota Motor Corp Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
