Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Robert Garrett, Jr. v. Franklin Richardson
as 21-6239
Defendant:
B. ROBERTS, STEPHON, C. HINDENBURG, II and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LOUIS GARRETT, JR., a/k/a Chubby, a/k/a Chubb, a/k/a Tru, a/k/a Kweli, a/k/a Justice
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANKLIN RICHARDSON, MCBRIDE and ROGERS
Robert Garrett, Jr. v. Franklin Richardson
as 19-7709
Defendant:
B. ROBERTS, STEPHON, C. HINDENBURG, II and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LOUIS GARRETT, JR., a/k/a Chubby, a/k/a Chubb, a/k/a Tru, a/k/a Kweli, a/k/a Justice
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANKLIN RICHARDSON, MCBRIDE and ROGERS
Robert Garrett, Jr. v. Franklin Richardson
as 19-7172
Defendant:
B. ROBERTS, STEPHON, C. HINDENBURG, II and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LOUIS GARRETT, JR., a/k/a Chubby, a/k/a Chubb, a/k/a Tru, a/k/a Kweli, a/k/a Justice
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANKLIN RICHARDSON, MCBRIDE and ROGERS
Robert Garrett, Jr. v. Franklin Richardson
as 19-6837
Defendant:
B. ROBERTS, STEPHON, C. HINDENBURG, II and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LOUIS GARRETT, JR., a/k/a Chubby, a/k/a Chubb, a/k/a Tru, a/k/a Kweli, a/k/a Justice
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANKLIN RICHARDSON, MCBRIDE and ROGERS
Robert Garrett, Jr. v. Franklin Richardson
as 19-6528
Defendant:
B. ROBERTS, STEPHON, C. HINDENBURG, II and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LOUIS GARRETT, JR., a/k/a Chubby, a/k/a Chubb, a/k/a Tru, a/k/a Kweli, a/k/a Justice
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANKLIN RICHARDSON, MCBRIDE and ROGERS
RIVERS V DVA
as 01-7055
Respondent-Appellee:
ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant-Appellant:
DEREK K. RIVERS, DEREK K. RIVERS and DEREK K. RIVERS
RIVERS V DVA
as 00-7120
Claimant-Appellant:
DEREK K. RIVERS
Respondent-Appellee:
HERSHEL W. GOBER, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
