Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company v. Kamal et al
as 1:2024cv10851
Plaintiff:
Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company
Defendant:
Manoj Kamal and Sandeep Bedi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Suleiman et al v. El Jadid et al
as 1:2022cv12083
Plaintiff:
Ali Yousef Suleiman, Qesi Suleiman, Kamal Erraihani and others
Defendant:
Driss El Jadid and Boston Limo Ride Inc
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10838
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mroue v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv10144
Plaintiff:
Kamal Mroue
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Hoverboard LLC
Not Yet Classified:
Judge Jennifer C. Boal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bushansky v. Carlucci et al
as 1:2017cv12091
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Joseph A. Carlucci, Syed T. Kamal, Michael E. Boxer and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Messner Reeves LLP (US) et al v. Jaffrey et al
as 1:2017mc91142
Plaintiff:
Messner Reeves LLP (US) and Mintz Group LLC
Defendant:
Syed Mohammed Razi H Jaffrey, Syed Kamal Haider Jaffrey and Wingate Capital, Inc. a/k/a Wingate Capital New York
Esposito v. American Renal Associates Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv11797
Plaintiff:
Mary Esposito
Defendant:
American Renal Associates Holdings, Inc., Joseph A. Carlucci, Jonathan L. Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Kamal v. Egon Zehnder International
as 1:2010cv10641
Plaintiff:
Fahad Kamal
Defendant:
Egon Zehnder International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boutros v. Bauer Corporation
as 1:2008cv12074
Plaintiff:
Kamal Boutros
Defendant:
Bauer Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Kamal v. Sabol
as 4:2008cv40230
Petitioner:
William David Kamal
Respondent:
Carolyn A. Sabol
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
