Cases 11 - 20 of 118
CRUZ v. TAYLOR
as 1:2023cv03305
Petitioner:
JOSE F. CRUZ
Respondent:
KAREN TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NEILIO v. CAMDEN COUNTY et al
as 1:2023cv02702
Plaintiff:
MORGAN NEILIO
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY, KAREN TAYLOR, CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAZA v. TAYLOR
as 1:2023cv01869
Petitioner:
SAJID RAZA
Respondent:
KAREN TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BROWN v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2023cv01729
Plaintiff:
RONALD R. BROWN
Defendant:
KAREN TAYLOR and CAMDEN COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corp. et al
as 3:2023cv15659
Plaintiff:
Karen Taylor
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corp., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CRUZ v. TAYLOR
as 1:2022cv07565
Petitioner:
JOSE F CRUZ
Respondent:
KAREN TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RAZA v. TAYLOR
as 1:2022cv06494
Petitioner:
SAJID RAZA
Respondent:
KAREN TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RAZA v. TAYLOR
as 1:2022cv06016
Petitioner:
SAJID RAZA
Respondent:
KAREN TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NIGRO v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2022cv05694
Petitioner:
PHILLIP NIGRO
Respondent:
KAREN TAYLOR, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and KARON TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOUGLAS v. TRINIDAD et al
as 1:2022cv04936
Plaintiff:
MELVIN R. DOUGLAS
Defendant:
KEVIN TRINIDAD, JOSEPH DIULIO, ARLINGTON RUSSELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
