Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 21 - 30 of 42
TOPP v. GRIFFIN
as 1:2017cv01265
Respondent: KATHY GRIFFIN
Petitioner: BRAD TOPP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lashbrook v. Griffin
as 3:2017cv00276
Plaintiff: Daniel K Lashbrook
Defendant: Kathy Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stafford v. Knight et al
as 3:2017cv00228
Plaintiff: James Blair Stafford
Defendant: Stan Knight, Craig Grage and Kathy Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Chain-O-Lakes IDOC
as 1:2017cv00059
Plaintiff: Lowell B Jones
Defendant: Chain-O-Lakes IDOC and Kathy Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Indiana Department of Correction et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00012
Defendant: Indiana Department of Correction, Commissioner Bruce Lemmon, Superintendent Kathy Griffin and others
Plaintiff: Travis A Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LATTIMORE v. GRIFFIN
as 1:2016cv03489
Respondent: KATHY GRIFFIN
Petitioner: JAMES L. LATTIMORE
Miscellaneou: PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steele v. Griffin et al
as 3:2016cv00573
Plaintiff: Shaun L Steele
Defendant: Kathy Griffin, Wendy Knight, Dave Liebel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDMONDS v. GRIFFIN
as 1:2016cv01817
Petitioner: JOHNNY EDMONDS
Respondent: KATHY GRIFFIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rimschneider v. Griffin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00415
Plaintiff: Michael L Rimschneider
Defendant: Kathy Griffin, Katy Griffin, Rita Beemer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHREIBER v. GRIFFIN
as 1:2016cv01506
Respondent: KATHY GRIFFIN
Petitioner: DAVID SCHREIBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?