Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Katz, Sapper & Miller LLP, et alIn re: Katz, Sapper & Miller LLP, et al
as 20-507
Petitioner:
ANDREW J. MANCHIR, KSM BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. and In re: KATZ, SAPPER & MILLER LLP
Respondent:
ZANDER GROUP HOLDINGS INC. and JEFFREY J. ZANDER
Zander Group Holdings Inc. et al v. Katz, Sapper & Miller LLP et al
as 3:2018cv00653
Defendant:
Katz, Sapper & Miller LLP, KSM Business Services Inc. and Andrew J. Manchir
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey J. Zander and Zander Group Holdings Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jeffrey Zander, et al v. Katz, Sapper & Miller LLP, et al
as 15-5193
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JEFFREY J. ZANDER, individually and as Trustee of the CARDINAL TRUST under Agreement dated February 11, 2009 and JJZ INSURANCE AGENCY, a Tennessee general partnership, dba Zander Insurance Group
Defendant - Appellant:
KATZ, SAPPER & MILLER LLP, KSM BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. and ANDREW J. MANCHIR
Jeffrey Zander, et al v. Katz, Sapper & Miller LLP, et al
as 15-5143
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY J. ZANDER, individually and as Trustee of the CARDINAL TRUST under Agreement dated February 11, 2009 and JJZ INSURANCE AGENCY, a Tennessee general partnership, dba Zander Insurance Group
Defendant - Appellee:
KATZ, SAPPER & MILLER LLP, KSM BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. and ANDREW J. MANCHIR
In re: Jeffrey Zander, et al
as 15-5041
Petitioner:
In re: JEFFREY J. ZANDER, individually and as Trustee of the CARDINAL TRUST under Agreement dated February 11, 2009 and JJZ INSURANCE AGENCY, a Tennessee general partnership, dba Zander Insurance Group
Respondent:
KATZ, SAPPER & MILLER LLP, KSM BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. and ANDREW J. MANCHIR
Zander et al v. Katz, Sapper & Miller, LLP et al
as 3:2012cv00967
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey J. Zander and JJZ Insurance Agency
Defendant:
Katz, Sapper & Miller, LLP , KSM Business Services, Inc. and Andrew J. Manchir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
