Cases 11 - 20 of 22
PETERSON v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2016cv01280
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, MISTY CECIL, JENNIFER FRENCH and others
Plaintiff:
ALLENN PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TURNER v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv01949
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, DRISCOLL, DUNN and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN S. TURNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. Mize et al
as 3:2015cv00556
Plaintiff:
JaVon Crockett Berry
Defendant:
Brent Mize, Keith Butts, Mr Willson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RILEY v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2015cv01818
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, KELLY HOFMAN, HOLINGER and others
Plaintiff:
CLINTON TROY RILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAMERON v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2015cv01602
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, RICE and LARRY STORM
Plaintiff:
LARRY D. CAMERON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCFERSON v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2015cv01577
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES INC., LAURENCE DAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
DEONTA MCFERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
COLLINS v. LEMMONS et al
as 1:2015cv01426
Defendant:
DESMA ALLEN, DIANA BUCKMASTER, KEITH BUTTS and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH COLLINS
Corizon:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TURNER v. THE GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2015cv01197
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, THE GEO GROUP INC. and JUSTIN UPCHURCH
Plaintiff:
KEVIN S. TURNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNDERHILL v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2015cv01119
Defendant:
D. ALTMAN, KEITH BUTTS, CASEBERE and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY UNDERHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. WRIGHT et al
as 1:2015cv00945
Defendant:
ALTMAN, BIAS, KEITH BUTTS and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MACK TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
