Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Kelley v. Quality Correctional Health Care et al
as 3:2015cv00843
Plaintiff:
Daniel George Kelley
Defendant:
Quality Correctional Health Care, Unknown Kern, Unknown Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. Hogan et al
as 3:2015cv00534
Plaintiff:
Daniel George Kelley
Defendant:
Unknown Hogan and MDOC Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. Buscher et al
as 3:2014cv00512
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kelley
Defendant:
J. Buscher, Mr. Little and D. Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. Yalobosha County MS Sherriff's Dept et al
as 3:2014cv00051
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kelley
Defendant:
Yalobosha County MS Sherriff's Dept, Lloyd Defer, Steve Story and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. Sollie
as 3:2014cv00196
Plaintiff:
Landis Kelley
Defendant:
W.D. Billy Sollie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kelley v. Buscher et al
as 3:2014cv00082
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kelley
Defendant:
J. Buscher, Investigator Alexander, Lt. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. Wells Fargo, N.A. et al
as 1:2013cv00354
Plaintiff:
Christina Kelley
Defendant:
Wells Fargo, N.A. , Morris and Associates , Kenneth Bourque and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelley v. Lauderdale County Jail et al
as 4:2013cv00116
Plaintiff:
Paul Mandoza Kelley
Defendant:
Lauderdale County Jail, Billie Sollie, Unknown Starks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arevalo v. M.T.C. et al
as 4:2013cv00083
Plaintiff:
William Arevalo
Defendant:
M.T.C., GEO Group Inc., D. McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00576
Plaintiff:
James Anderson, All Plaintiffs, Sierra Batiste and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
