Cases 31 - 40 of 109
Kelly v. Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services et al
as 1:2018cv02009
Plaintiff:
Anthony Quintin Kelly
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services and Correctional Officer (John Doe)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Kelly v. Conmed Healthcare Services et al
as 8:2018cv01441
Plaintiff:
Brett D Kelly
Defendant:
Conmed Healthcare Services, Felicia and Howard County Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Bishop, Warden et al
as 1:2018cv01013
Plaintiff:
Anthony Kelly
Defendant:
Frank B. Bishop, Warden, Jeff Nines, Assistant Warden, William Bohrer, Chief of Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. State of Maryland State House et al
as 1:2018cv00694
Plaintiff:
Anthony Q Kelly
Defendant:
State of Maryland State House, Maryland Department of Public Saftey, Warren G Mallow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv03335
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kelly v. Simpson
as 1:2017cv02872
Plaintiff:
Anthony Quintin Kelly
Defendant:
Leslie A. Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Bishop, Jr. et al
as 1:2017cv02330
Petitioner:
Anthony Q. Kelly
Respondent:
Frank B. Bishop, Jr. and John McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kelly v. Bishop et al
as 1:2017cv02066
Petitioner:
Anthony Quentin Kelly
Respondent:
Frank B. Bishop, Jr. and John McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kelly v. Bishop et al
as 1:2017cv02065
Petitioner:
Anthony Quentin Kelly
Respondent:
Frank B. Bishop, Jr. and John McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Anne Arundel County Police Department et al
as 8:2017cv01913
Plaintiff:
Kelly Anthony Williams
Defendant:
Anne Arundel County Police Department, Robin Rickard, Henry Affeldt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
