Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Redfield v. Linder et al
as 1:2017cv00121
Plaintiff:
Richard Roland Redfield
Defendant:
Mike Linder and Felicia Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates v. Yellowstone County Detention Facility et al
as 1:2017cv00113
Plaintiff:
Eddie R. Bates, Sr.
Defendant:
Yellowstone County Detention Facility, CHP Medical Providers and Staff, Heidi Effinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Forbes et al.
as 6:2017cv00061
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Kelly Forbes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Henze v. Ferriter et al
as 6:2016cv00107
Plaintiff:
Mark Henze
Defendant:
Mike Ferriter , Kelly Speer , Greg Budd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wickham v. Community Correction and Counseling Services et al
as 2:2015cv00018
Plaintiff:
Kelly S. Wickham
Defendant:
Community Correction and Counseling Services, Michael Thatcher and Medical Provider No. 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wickham v. Community Correction and Counseling Services et al
as 6:2015cv00035
Plaintiff:
Kelly S. Wickham
Defendant:
Community Correction and Counseling Services, Michael Thatcher, Medical Provider No. 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimenez v. Bowen et al
as 4:2015cv00013
Plaintiff:
Freddy Wayne Jimenez
Defendant:
Jason Michael Bowen, Ryan Weldon, Blackfeet Indian Tribe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Kirkegard et al
as 6:2013cv00026
Petitioner:
Gyme Kelly
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly v. Kirkegard et al
as 9:2013cv00084
Petitioner:
Gyme Kelly
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mortenson v. USA
as 4:2012cv00076
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kelly Ruth Mortenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
