Cases 41 - 50 of 95
KAVANAGH v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06659
Plaintiff:
KELLY KAVANAGH
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06316
Plaintiff:
KELLY HARRIS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLY v. JOHNSON
as 2:2016cv02553
Petitioner:
DUANE KELLY
Respondent:
STEVEN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KELLY v. COUNTY OF CAPE MAY et al
as 1:2016cv02447
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KELLY
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAPE MAY, CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER MEDICAL PROVIDER, HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYKINS v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2015cv07769
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. BOYKINS
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, STEPHEN JOHNSON, ANTONIO CAMPOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITAKER v. NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON et al
as 3:2015cv06744
Plaintiff:
QUADIR WHITAKER
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, G. KELLY and P. HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYKINS v. PINHO et al
as 2:2015cv06295
Plaintiff:
PERRY BOYKINS
Defendant:
PINHO, DELA PRIDA, T. KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2015cv05201
Plaintiff:
JESSICA C. GRAHAM
Defendant:
ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT, RODRIGUEZ, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2015cv03932
Petitioner:
EUGENE I. KELLY
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MASSEY v. HENDRICKS et al
as 2:2015cv03613
Plaintiff:
KEITH R. MASSEY
Defendant:
ROY L. HENDRICKS, KELLY, MICHAEL OJELADE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
