Cases 21 - 30 of 504
Vargas v. LaValley et al
as 9:2022cv00806
Plaintiff:
Antonio Vargas
Defendant:
LaValley, C.O. Kelly, Duray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. Annucci et al
as 9:2022cv00701
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Scott Kelly, Earl Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Tellez
as 1:2022cv03895
Plaintiff:
Robert Sylvester Kelly
Defendant:
Warden Heriberto H. Tellez, MDC Brooklyn, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Clark v. Jordan, et al
as 1:2022cv04937
Plaintiff:
Jahmel J. Clark
Defendant:
Lt. Jordant, Kelly, Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Ripp et al
as 2:2022cv03262
Plaintiff:
Courtney D. Jordan
Defendant:
Steven Ripp, Brian Keyes, Liam Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rickenbacker v. John Doe No. 1 et al
as 9:2022cv00541
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Rickenbacker
Defendant:
John Doe No. 1, John Doe No. 2, John Doe No. 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Muran et al
as 1:2022cv03008
Plaintiff:
Tearre M. Williams
Defendant:
Kelly Muran, Judge N. Ross and Steven Hoffner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCollum v. Rochester Psychiatric Center et al
as 6:2022cv06057
Plaintiff:
Darius McCollum
Defendant:
Rochester Psychiatric Center, Jannette Wilson, Benita Zanders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Burrell v. Durkin et al
as 9:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Charlie Durkin, King, D. Lashway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harnett v. Russel
as 1:2022cv00589
Petitioner:
Kelly Harnett
Respondent:
Eileen Russel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
