Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Rudman v. CHC Group Ltd.
as 16-4096
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Errol Rudman, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Rudman Partners L.P., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and Peter McCrory, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
William J. Amelio, Joan S. Hooper, Rebecca Camden and others
Defendant:
CHC Group Ltd.
Rudman et al v. CHC Group Ltd. et al
as 1:2015cv03773
Plaintiff:
Errol Rudman and Rudman Partners LP
Defendant:
CHC Group Ltd., William J. Amelio, Joan S. Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
McCrory v. CHC Group Ltd. et al
as 1:2015cv03796
Plaintiff:
Peter McCrory
Defendant:
CHC Group Ltd. , William J. Amelio , Joan S. Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moore v. Newton et al
as 1:2014cv06473
Defendant:
Juner Cevallos and Dana Newton
646) 601-2857 (fax:
Kenneth E. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Pinnock et al
as 1:2014cv05524
Petitioner:
Kenneth E. Moore
Respondent:
Deputy Newton and Sr. Parole Officer Pinnock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moore v. Pinnock et al
as 6:2014cv06446
Petitioner:
Kenneth E. Moore
Respondent:
Pinnock and Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moore v. Peters et al
as 6:2013cv06271
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Moore
Defendant:
J. Peters, Reynolds, Caslin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
