Cases 11 - 20 of 31
CONLEY v. DISTEFANO et al
as 3:2015cv01512
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CONLEY
Defendant:
J. DISTEFANO, SALVATORE D'AMICO, ANTONIO CAMPOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. NELSON et al
as 2:2015cv01219
Petitioner:
DELVIN WRIGHT
Respondent:
KENNETH NELSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KADONSKY v. KOCH et al
as 3:2014cv08105
Plaintiff:
STEVEN KADONSKY
Defendant:
BRIAN KOCH, SID. OFF. WISE, V. WOJCIECHOWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTS v. NELSON et al
as 2:2014cv08095
Petitioner:
ALBERT ROBERTS
Respondent:
KENNETH NELSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. NELSON et al
as 1:2014cv07788
Petitioner:
MELVIN SHAWN JONES
Respondent:
KENNETH NELSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. STOUT et al
as 3:2014cv07699
Plaintiff:
LARRY JOHNSON
Defendant:
CARL STOUT, ANTHONY ANDERSON, II, LISA JANTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. STOUT et al
as 3:2014cv07388
Plaintiff:
LARRY O. JOHNSON
Defendant:
CARL STOUT, ANTHONY ANDERSON, II, LISA JANTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUGH v. NELSON et al
as 2:2014cv06209
Petitioner:
STANFORD YOUGH
Respondent:
KENNETH NELSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DYKEMAN v. NELSON
as 2:2014cv06111
Petitioner:
WILLIAM DYKEMAN
Respondent:
KENNETH NELSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LOVE v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2014cv05629
Plaintiff:
LEMONT LOVE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , NORTHERN STATE PRISON , GARY LANIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.