Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ou-Young v. State of California, et al.
as 26-357
Plaintiff:
KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, EDMUND G. BROWN, JR. and others
Ou-Young v. State of California et al
as 5:2025cv09774
Defendant:
State of California, State Bar of California, Edmund G. Brown, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao Paul Ou-Young
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Ou-Young v. State of California et al
as 5:2025mc80353
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young
Defendant:
State of California, State Bar of California, Edmund G. Brown, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Ou-Young v. Robbins et al
as 3:2025mc80234
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young
Defendant:
Patrick D. Robbins, Pamela T. Johann, Jeffrey D. Nedrow and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Ou-Young v. Nixon, et al.
as 25-4920
Plaintiff:
KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG
Defendant:
THOMAS J. NIXON, Judge of Alameda County Superior Court, STEPHEN KAUS, Former Judge at State Court, KARIN SCHWARTZ, Judge at State Court and others
Ou-Young v. Nixon, et al.
as 25-4916
Plaintiff:
KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG
Defendant:
THOMAS J. NIXON, Judge of Alameda Court Superior Court, Judge STEPHEN KAUS, Judge KARIN SCHWARTZ and others
Ou-Young v. Nixon, et. al.
as 3:2025mc80175
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young
Defendant:
Thomas J. Nixon, Judge Stephen Kaus, Judge Karin Schwartz and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Ou-Young v. Nixon et al
as 5:2025mc80161
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao Paul Ou-Young
Defendant:
Thomas Nixon, Stephen Kaus, Karin Schwartz and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Ou-Young v. Nixon et al
as 5:2025mc80155
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young
Defendant:
Thomas J. Nixon, Stephen Kaus, Karin Schwartz and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Kenneth Thomas Perez v. US Bank et al
as 2:2018cv02425
Defendant:
Experian, Transunion and US Bank
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Thomas Perez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
