Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv04064
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Push Pedal Pull, Inc. v. Casperson et al
as 4:2013cv04057
Plaintiff:
Push Pedal Pull, Inc.
Defendant:
Kent Casperson and 2nd Wind Exercise Equipment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Hazelrigg v. United States of America
as 5:2012cv05034
Petitioner:
Kent Hazelrigg
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hazelrigg v. Vargo et al
as 5:2012cv05032
Plaintiff:
Kent Hazelrigg
Defendant:
Mark A. Vargo and Karen E. Scheirer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Marco, Inc. v. Advanced Systems, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv04072
Plaintiff:
Marco, Inc.
Defendant:
Advanced Systems, Inc. , Christine M. Bergeson , Wayne C. Ewing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barbour v. Ghouls Stanford
as 4:2010cv04071
Plaintiff:
Kent Barbour
Defendant:
Ghouls Stanford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barbour v. Ghouls Stanford
as 4:2010cv04171
Plaintiff:
Kent Barbour
Defendant:
Ghouls Stanford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Onnen et al v. Sioux Falls Independent School District No. 49-5 et al
as 4:2007cv04174
Plaintiff:
Matt Onnen and USA
Defendant:
Sioux Falls Independent School District No. 49-5 , Darin Darby , Deanna Barth and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 False Claims Act (use "sc" subtype)
Baker et al v. Masco Builder Cabinet Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv05085
Plaintiff:
Cody Baker, Cody Baker, James V. McCoy and others
Defendant:
Masco Builder Cabinet Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
United States of America v. Miller et al
as 1:2008cv01017
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kent A. Miller, Connie F. Miller, Dacotah Bank of Sisseton and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
