Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Johnson v. Miskell
as 1:2016cv00841
Plaintiff:
Timothy Johnson
Defendant:
Kevin Miskell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis Hughes v. Kevin Miskell, et al
as 14-2726
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS HUGHES
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN MISKELL, Psychiatry Manager in his individual and official capacity, THOMAS LESKOWSKY, Director of Health Care Services, Individually and in his official capacity and RICHARD ELLERS, Chief of Clinical Services for the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
Dennis Hughes v. Kevin Miskell, et al
as 13-4726
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS HUGHES
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN MISKELL, Psychiatry Manager in his individual and official capacity, THOMAS LESKOWSKY, Director of Health Care Services, Individually and in his official capacity and RICHARD ELLERS, Chief of Clinical Services for the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
Montanez v. Keller et al
as 3:2013cv02564
Plaintiff:
Domingo Colon Montanez
Defendant:
Richard Keller, Bart Josefowicz, Kevin Miskell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keeling v. Damiter, et al
as 11-3002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL EVAN KEELING
Defendant - Appellee:
PETE DAMITER, Corr/Supt/Assistance SCI Frackville, C/O GUARD SMITHROVICH, MIRANDA and others
Jacobs v. District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2010cv02622
Plaintiff:
Andre Jacobs
Defendant:
District Attorney's Office, Jeffery A. Beard, Office of Professional Responsibility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Miskell et al
as 3:2010cv01443
Plaintiff:
Dennis Hughes
Defendant:
Kevin Miskell, Thomas Leskowsky, Prison Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Beard et al
as 1:2007cv00820
Plaintiff:
Curtis G. Jackson
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Ph.D., James T. Wynder, Jr. and Kevin Miskell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
