Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Arpke v. Key Lakes, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv11898
Plaintiff:
Robert Arpke
Defendant:
Key Lakes, Inc., Key Lakes I, Inc. and Key Lakes II, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Chesky v. Keystone Shipping, Co. et al
as 2:2017cv11456
Defendant:
Keystone Shipping, Co. and Key Lakes, I, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Allen Chesky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Engebretson v. Key Lakes, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv11920
Plaintiff:
James Engebretson
Defendant:
Key Lakes, Inc., Key Lakes I, Inc., Key Lakes II, Inc., Key Lakes III, Inc., and/or Key Lakes IV, Inc., and Canadian National Railway Company, and/or CN Ore Dock, Key Lakes I, Inc. , Key Lakes II, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Daniels v. Key Lakes I, Inc.
as 2:2014cv14620
Plaintiff:
David Daniels
Defendant:
Key Lakes I, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
DANIELS v. KEYSTONE SHIPPING COMPANY et al
as 1:2014cv00263
Plaintiff:
DAVID DANIELS
Defendant:
KEYSTONE SHIPPING COMPANY, KEY LAKES I, INC. and KEY LAKES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Oswald, Jr. v. Keystone Shipping Co. et al
as 2:2014cv13842
Plaintiff:
Albert D. Oswald, Jr.
Defendant:
Keystone Shipping Co. , Key Lakes I, Inc. and Key Lakes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Hunt v. Keystone Shipping Co, et al
as 2:2012cv11159
Plaintiff:
Billy Joe Hunt
Defendant:
Keystone Shipping Co , Key Lakes I, Inc. and Key Lakes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Hilla v. Keystone Shipping Co. et al
as 2:2010cv14881
Plaintiff:
James Hilla
Defendant:
Keystone Shipping Co., Key Lakes, Inc. and Key Lakes, I, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Ahmed v. Keystone Shipping Co. et al
as 2:2010cv14642
Plaintiff:
Hussein Ahmed
Defendant:
Keystone Shipping Co., Key Lakes, Inc. and Key Lakes I, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Quraish v. Keystone Shipping Co. et al
as 2:2010cv10693
Plaintiff:
Fadel Quraish
Defendant:
Keystone Shipping Co., Key Lakes, Inc. and Key Lakes I, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
