Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Troche v. Toldo et al
as 8:2021cv02640
Plaintiff:
Jose Troche
Defendant:
Michael Toldo, Brian Finch, Bobby Lubrido and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melendy v. State of Florida et al
as 8:2021cv02241
Plaintiff:
Mitchel Melendy and Mitchel Anthony Melendy
Defendant:
State of Florida, Pasco, Kimberly Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melendy v. Nocco et al
as 8:2021cv00664
Defendant:
Land O' Lakes Detention Center, Virginia M. Hernandez Covington, Kimberly Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchel Melendy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melendy v. State of Florida et al
as 8:2020cv01879
Defendant:
Bruce Vincent, Lloyd Johansen, Robert Ashley and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchel Anthony Melendy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPBELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv09780
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY CAMPBELL
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fowler v. Campbell
as 8:2018cv02122
Defendant:
Kimberly Campbell
Plaintiff:
Eric Orlando Fowler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacqueline Cooley, et al v. HMR of Alabama, Inc.
as 18-10657
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACQUELINE COOLEY, HEATHER ADAMS, ROSIE BOYD and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HMR OF ALABAMA, INC., d.b.a. Robert L. Howard Veterans Home
Jacqueline Cooley, et al v. HMR of Alabama, Inc.
as 18-10657
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACQUELINE COOLEY, HEATHER ADAMS, ROSIE BOYD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
HMR OF ALABAMA, INC., d.b.a. Robert L. Howard Veterans Home
Campbell v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04728
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Campbell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell et al v. Diamonds International, LLC
as 1:2017cv01081
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Campbell and Bryant Campbell
Defendant:
Diamonds International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
