Cases 1 - 10 of 374
Twin City Fire Insurance Company v. RK Family, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02275
Plaintiff:
Twin City Fire Insurance Company
Defendant:
RK Family, Inc., RK Holdings, LLP doing business as Rural King and Shaun Amrine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Josephine Macfadyen v. Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, et al
as 24-1207
Plaintiff:
JOSEPHINE CHINELO MACFADYEN, Individually and as surviving spouse of David King
Defendant:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, In official capacity, ACTING DIRECTOR, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, In official capacity and DETROIT DISTRICT OFFICE DIRECTOR, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, Detroit District Office
Duncan v. King
as 3:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Duncan
Defendant:
Hon. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Anthony KingIn re: Anthony King
as 24-5226
Petitioner:
In re: ANTHONY W. KING
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Eric King
as 24-3095
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIC KING
King v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al.
as 3:2023cv02403
Plaintiff:
Robert King
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and Judson Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. James King, II
as 24-1089
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES RUSSELL KING, II, aka Jake King
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Garrian King
as 23-5992
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GARRIAN KING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
