Cases 1 - 10 of 13
KING v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2019cv06155
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and STEPHEN JOHNSON
Petitioner:
GEORGE KING, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KING v. KIRBY
as 1:2016cv08993
Petitioner:
CURTIS KING
Respondent:
MARK KIRBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KING v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv01823
Petitioner:
GEORGE KING
Respondent:
STEVEN JOHNSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KING v. JOHNSON et al
as 3:2016cv01620
Petitioner:
GEORGE KING
Respondent:
STEPHEN JOHNSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KING v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv00654
Petitioner:
GEORGE KING
Respondent:
STEPHEN JOHNSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KING v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2013cv00477
Petitioner:
LESLIE R. KING
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, GARY M. LANIGAN and JEFFREY CHIESA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KING v. LANIGAN et al
as 2:2013cv00055
Petitioner:
LESLIE R. KING
Respondent:
GARY M. LANIGAN, JEFFREY CHEISA and STATE OF NEW JEREY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KING v. BARTOWSKI
as 1:2011cv04358
Petitioner:
WARREN KING
Respondent:
GREG BARTOWSKI and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KING v. RICCI et al
as 2:2010cv03753
Petitioner:
LESLIE KING
Respondent:
MICHELLE R. RICCI and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KING v. REILLY et al
as 1:2010cv01237
Petitioner:
BENJAMIN KING
Respondent:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR. and ANGELA HAYNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
