Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Bryson v. Hice et al
as 3:2024cv00860
Plaintiff:
Jessica Bryson
Defendant:
Curtis Hice, Samuel Dalton, Steven Weathersbee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
King v. State of South Carolina
as 2:2023cv02797
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dionetre King
Defendant:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Bryson v. Hice et al
as 3:2023cv02743
Plaintiff:
Jessica Bryson
Defendant:
Curtis Hice, Samuel Dalton, Steven Weathersbee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Bieger et al v. Sumter, City of et al
as 3:2023cv01641
Plaintiff:
Joanna G. Bieger and Andrew Bieger
Defendant:
Sumter, City of, Sumter Police Department, Sargent Jeremy VanAllen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
King v. Chester, South Carolina, City of, et al
as 0:2022cv03614
Plaintiff:
Justin King
Defendant:
Chester, City of, South Carolina, Nicholas Harris and Chester, South Carolina, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Qualls v. McBee, Town of et al
as 4:2022cv02186
Plaintiff:
Michael Qualls
Defendant:
McBee, Town of, Barbara Lisenby and Terri King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Hixon v. King et al
as 8:2022cv01240
Plaintiff:
Bret Kyle Hixon
Defendant:
Daniel King, Karen Roper, Shannon Ellenburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
King v. Wilson et al
as 5:2022cv01072
Plaintiff:
Eugene King
Defendant:
AG Alan Wilson, Daniel E Shearouse, Asst. AG Samantha J Weidauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Kilgo v. King et al
as 6:2021cv03511
Plaintiff:
Denardis Kilgo
Defendant:
Alvin T King and Seldon T Peden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VanDerHorst v. Officer John Shaver et al
as 2:2020cv02501
Defendant:
Officer Shaver, South Carolina, State of, F.T.O Croy and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lavar VanDerHorst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
