Cases 11 - 20 of 87
King v. McGraw
as 1:2022cv01491
Plaintiff:
Karl L. King
Defendant:
Attorney Brian R. McGraw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
King v. Fender et al
as 1:2022cv01372
Plaintiff:
Todd A. King
Defendant:
Warden Warden Fender, Assistant Warden Ms King, Unit Manager Padilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. State Of Ohio
as 3:2022cv00184
Petitioner:
Todd A. King
Respondent:
State Of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bates v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00337
Plaintiff:
Robert Bates
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Annette Chambers-Smith, Ron Erdos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Warden, Lake Erie Correctional Institution
as 3:2022cv00154
Petitioner:
Todd A King
Respondent:
Warden, Lake Erie Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv00713
Petitioner:
Karl L. King
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Feathers v. Smith, et al
as 3:2022cv00463
Plaintiff:
David E. Feathers
Defendant:
Annette Chambers Smith, Chief Inspector Chris Lambert, Warden Leon Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Patterson, Jr. v. Smith et al
as 3:2021cv02210
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Patterson, Jr.
Defendant:
Ms. Annette Chambers Smith, Beth Oehler, Thomas King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. USA
as 1:2021cv01387
Petitioner:
Errol Dontes King
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Francis v. Core Civic et al
as 1:2021cv00418
Defendant:
Inst. Inspector Sackett, Officer Sheldon, Erie County Correctional Institution and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Matthew Francis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
