Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Vidal v. King et al
as 3:2024cv01015
Petitioner:
Tommy Ray Vidal
Respondent:
Adam King and Leslie Rachael Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Garcia v. Warden King
as 4:2024cv00251
Petitioner:
Juan Daniel Garcia
Respondent:
Warden King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Samuelson v. King et al
as 4:2023cv01126
Petitioner:
Michael Dean Samuelson
Respondent:
Warden King, Rene Hinojosa and Russ Authier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03742
Petitioner:
Rodolfo King Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cadena v. King
as 4:2023cv00902
Petitioner:
Michael Cadena
Respondent:
Johnson County Jail and Adam King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv01776
Petitioner:
Rodolfo King Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wyatt et al v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2023cv01210
Petitioner:
George Wyatt, Jr, Joe M Balencia, Rodolfo King Jones and others
Respondent:
State of Texas, USA, Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rolan v. Hanna et al
as 3:2022cv01691
Petitioner:
Steven Rolan
Respondent:
Dale S Hanna and Adam King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
King v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00741
Petitioner:
Billy Joe King
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brewer v. King
as 4:2022cv00542
Petitioner:
Larry J. Brewer
Respondent:
Warden Ron King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
