Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Flores, Angel v. Oxford Wisconsin (Medical) Federal Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2017cv00526
Plaintiff:
Angel A. Flores
Defendant:
Oxford Wisconsin (Medical) Federal Correctional Institution , King and Laufenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King v. Litscher et al
as 2:2017cv00201
Plaintiff:
Aerion C King
Defendant:
Jon Litscher , Cathy Jess, Scott Eckstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Eckstein et al
as 2:2017cv00205
Plaintiff:
Aerion C King
Defendant:
Scott Eckstein , John Kind, Michael Schultz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen v. Dallet et al
as 2:2016cv01677
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Bowen
Defendant:
Rebecca F Dallet, Scott Walker, Wisconsin Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Smith
as 2:2016cv00732
Petitioner:
Mario King
Respondent:
Judy Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Almond v. Wisconsin Division of Community Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv00615
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Almond
Defendant:
Wisconsin Division of Community Corrections, John Doe, Miles Jobke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King, John v. Spears, Robert et al
as 3:2016cv00144
Plaintiff:
John Roy King
Defendant:
Robert Spears, Brant Foltman and David Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. United States of America
as 2:2015cv01331
Petitioner:
Eric R King, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bowen v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv00255
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Bowen
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections , New Lisbon Correctional Institution, Columbia Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flournoy, Michael v. McKenzie, John et al
as 3:2014cv00554
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Flournoy
Defendant:
John G. McKenzie , United States Attorney Office NDI-WD , Thomas G. Bruton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
