Cases 41 - 50 of 278
King v. State Of Ohio
as 3:2022cv00184
Petitioner:
Todd A. King
Respondent:
State Of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Lazer Spot Inc.
as 1:2022cv00395
Plaintiff:
Antalita King
Defendant:
Lazer Spot Inc. and Lazer Spot Inc. doing business as Lazer Spot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bates v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00337
Plaintiff:
Robert Bates
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Annette Chambers-Smith, Ron Erdos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Warden, Lake Erie Correctional Institution
as 3:2022cv00154
Petitioner:
Todd A King
Respondent:
Warden, Lake Erie Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02248
Plaintiff:
Jeanette King
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
King v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
Robert King
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MESA Industries, Inc. v. Charter Industrial Supply, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
MESA Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Charter Industrial Supply, Inc., Alejandro Espinoza and Kyle King
King v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv01253
Plaintiff:
Robert King, Jr.
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
King et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00930
Plaintiff:
HEATHER L. KING and ANDREW KING
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
