Cases 1 - 10 of 21
King v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Michael King
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
King v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv01091
Not Classified By Court:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
Andrea King
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
King v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (TV1)
as 4:2021cv00004
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of and SSA Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Annette M. King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
King v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 3:2017cv00238
Plaintiff:
Dawn Colleen King
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
King v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (TWP2)
as 3:2017cv00125
Plaintiff:
Liletta J King
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
King v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv01058
Plaintiff:
Brian Hall King
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
King v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2014cv00317
Plaintiff:
Bradley Joseph King
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
King v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2014cv01917
Plaintiff:
Joe Mark King
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
King v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2013cv00118
Plaintiff:
Linda King
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
King v. Social Security Administration et al
as 3:2013cv00733
Plaintiff:
Keisha King
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
