Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv08108
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv06611
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv06695
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC., AKZO NOBEL COATINGS, INC., ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613
KIRKER ENTERPRISES, INC. v. GENOSCO
as 2:2011cv10394
Counter Claimant:
Genosco
Defendant:
Genosco
Counter Defendant:
KIRKER ENTERPRISES, INC.
Plaintiff:
KIRKER ENTERPRISES, INC.
KIRKER ENTERPRISES, INC. v. SKYLINE BEAUTY SUPPLY INC. et al
as 2:2011cv05450
Plaintiff:
KIRKER ENTERPRISES, INC.
Defendant:
SKYLINE BEAUTY SUPPLY INC. and KEVIN HUYNH
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
KIRKER ENTERPRISES, INC. v. LCN-USA, INC.
as 2:2011cv05402
Plaintiff:
KIRKER ENTERPRISES, INC.
Defendant:
LCN-USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
KIRKER ENTERPRISES, INC. v. CACEE INC., ET AL
as 2:2011cv05322
Plaintiff:
KIRKER ENTERPRISES, INC.
Defendant:
CACEE INC. and DECORATIVE INDUSTRIES (UK) LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
KIRKER ENTERPRISES, INC. v. MAX MAKEUP CHERIMOYA et al
as 2:2011cv03685
Plaintiff:
KIRKER ENTERPRISES, INC.
Defendant:
MAX MAKEUP CHERIMOYA, SUNNA KIM and JUNG HO YOO
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
KIRKER ENTERPRISES, INC. v. GENOSCO
as 2:2011cv03195
Plaintiff:
KIRKER ENTERPRISES, INC.
Defendant:
GENOSCO
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
KIRKER ENTERPRISES, INC. v. EXPRESSION BEAUTY WORKS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv02541
Plaintiff:
KIRKER ENTERPRISES, INC.
Defendant:
EXPRESSION BEAUTY WORKS, INC. , DE ROBLIN, INC. and LAYLA COSMETICS S.R.L.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
